Confirmed: discrepancies in audit reports AJA

Confirmed: discrepancies in audit reports AJA

Acrobat Reader highlights (in blue) the “signature” above separate from the other text in this Package Submission Checklist – IFCC. The “signature” is a separate file, added to the text without my explicit consent, and thus is falsified.
Acrobat Reader highlights (in blue) the “signature” above separate from the other text in this Package Submission Checklist – IFCC. The “signature” is a separate file, added to the text without my explicit consent, and thus is falsified.

Feb 3rd – almost 4 months after the initial complaint – Accredia finally confirmed the discrepancies in AJA’s audit reports. It responds:
Concerning your first complaint, please note that we have asked to the CAB to give us clarifications for the facts described into your complaint and to inform us about the actions that they intend to adopt in order to address it and avoid that similar facts could happen again.
The actions that the CAB’s proposed us seems acceptable. Nevertheless, as their implementation should have been effectively completed within December 2015, because of your update of yesterday, I ask you to give me further details about it.
We will deeply analyze the effective implementation of the action proposed during our next assessment at their offices.
Continue reading