Falsified signatures

Falsified signatures

The falsified signatures can be recognized as separate scans added to the reports.
The falsified signatures can be recognized as separate scans added to the reports.

It has come to my attention that several documents by PT AJA Sertifikasi Indonesia (AJA) bear my “signature”, including a PEFC Public Audit Report – SFM and a PEFC Package Submission Checklist. I herewith clarify that these “signatures” have been added without my consent, while various reports were altered without my approval. Consequently, I do not support the findings in any document by AJA that bears my “signature” (easily recognized as a separate image when right-clicking on it; see image right).

Suspect documents include, but are not limited to, the following: Continue reading

[LINK] Balancing detail and scale in assessing transparency to improve the governance of agricultural commodity supply chains

[LINK] Balancing detail and scale in assessing transparency to improve the governance of agricultural commodity supply chains

op-scTo date, assessments of the sustainability of agricultural commodity supply chains have largely relied on some combination of macro-scale footprint accounts, detailed life-cycle analyses and fine-scale traceability systems. Yet these approaches are limited in their ability to support the sustainability governance of agricultural supply chains, whether because they are intended for coarser-grained analyses, do not identify individual actors, or are too costly to be implemented in a consistent manner for an entire region of production. Here we illustrate some of the advantages of a complementary middle-ground approach that balances detail and scale of supply chain transparency information by combining consistent country-wide data on commodity production at the sub-national (e.g. municipal) level with per shipment customs data to describe trade flows of a given commodity covering all companies and production regions within that country. This approach can support supply chain governance in two key ways. First, enhanced spatial resolution of the production regions that connect to individual supply chains allows for a more accurate consideration of geographic variability in measures of risk and performance that are associated with different production practices. Second, identification of key actors that operate within a specific supply chain, including producers, traders, shippers and consumers can help discriminate coalitions of actors that have shared stake in a particular region, and that together are capable of delivering more cost-effective and coordinated interventions. We illustrate the potential of this approach with examples from Brazil, Indonesia and Colombia. We discuss how transparency information can deepen understanding of the environmental and social impacts of commodity production systems, how benefits are distributed among actors, and some of the trade-offs involved in efforts to improve supply chain sustainability. We then discuss the challenges and opportunities of our approach to strengthen supply chain governance and leverage more effective and fair accountability systems.

Read more here.

Refleksi Sertifikasi Perangsang Diskusi Roundtable ’20 Tahun Sertifikasi Indonesia’

Refleksi Sertifikasi Perangsang Diskusi Roundtable ’20 Tahun Sertifikasi Indonesia’

Going-going-gone
Going, going, gone… the fate of all protected species in production manscapes?

Perangsang Diskusi ini adalah penerjemahan sekalian pembaharuan dari ‘Certified Jungles?’ (Assen 2010), sebuah makalah terkait sertifikasi pengelolaan hutan (berkelanjutan) yang ditulis pada pertengahan 2007. Refleksi Sertifikasi ini mengidentifikasi isu-isu kunci dalam sertifikasi dan menyarankan pendekatan praktis untuk mengatasi masalah ini.

PDF available here.